August 20, 2024

The Case for Outsourcing: Debunking Common Misconceptions About Medical Device Contract Manufacturing

In the highly regulated, rapidly evolving medical device manufacturing industry, Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) often face critical decisions that can make or break their businesses. For example, companies must decide whether to outsource manufacturing to a Contract Manufacturer (CM) or fulfill the need in-house. Relinquishing control over such an important aspect of production makes many people uncomfortable. However, many of the concerns that give them pause stem from misconceptions or misunderstanding the benefits outsourcing can offer.

Here, you'll learn more about some of the most common reservations OEMs have about outsourcing medical device manufacturing to a CM. You'll also find counterarguments that demonstrate why partnering with a reputable CM could be the best choice for many OEMs.

Reservation 1: "We'll Lose Control Over the Manufacturing Process"

Plenty of OEMs fear losing control over the manufacturing process because they believe outsourcing is the same as handing over the reins entirely, which could lead to deviations from quality standards, timelines, and overall product integrity.

The Counterargument

In reality, reputable CMs are exceptionally transparent and collaborative. They often integrate OEMs into the manufacturing process more deeply than in-house operations might allow. With sophisticated project management tools, regular reporting, and stringent quality assurance protocols, CMs ensure that OEMs maintain visibility and control over every stage of production. 

Additionally, many CMs are certified to the same quality standards as OEMs, and they're committed to meeting or exceeding these standards so they can secure long-term business partnerships.

By partnering with a CM, OEMs could actually gain more control by leveraging the CM's specialized expertise and state-of-the-art facilities. By outsourcing manufacturing, OEMs get to focus on core competencies like R&D, marketing, and customer service while trusting the CM to handle the complexities of manufacturing.

Reservation 2: "Outsourcing Will Compromise Quality"

Quality is paramount in medical device manufacturing, where even minor defects can have serious implications. OEMs often fear that outsourcing to a CM will result in lower-quality products because they worry that a third party may not have the same commitment to quality as an in-house team.

The Counterargument

Contrary to this belief, many CMs make significant investments in quality management systems and regulatory compliance. CMs that specialize in medical device manufacturing are often certified to ISO 13485, a standard that sets stringent quality requirements. These certifications require CMs to follow rigorous quality control procedures, perform regular audits, and continuously improve processes.

On top of that, regulatory bodies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) work with CMs to ensure they meet high quality standards. The competitive nature of the CM industry also means that maintaining a reputation for quality is critical to a business's success. CMs have a vested interest in producing high-quality products that meet or exceed OEM expectations.

By outsourcing to a CM with a strong track record of quality and compliance, OEMs could actually enhance the quality of their products while benefiting from the CM's specialized expertise and dedication to maintaining the highest standards.

Reservation 3: "Outsourcing Is More Expensive"

Cost is always a critical factor in any business decision. Many OEMs assume that outsourcing will cost more than manufacturing in-house, especially when considering the potential costs of communication, logistics, and managing a partnership with a CM.

The Counterargument

While there are some costs associated with outsourcing, it's important to consider the broader financial picture. CMs often operate with economies of scale that allow them to produce medical devices more cost-effectively than an OEM could on its own. They may have access to bulk purchasing discounts for materials, more efficient production processes, and a facility specialized in medical device manufacturing, all of which contribute to cost savings.

It makes sense to compare potential prices, but in-house manufacturing will likely cost more when you need to invest in specialized equipment, source materials, and hire experts to oversee processes.

Outsourcing eliminates the need for OEMs to invest in expensive manufacturing equipment, facility maintenance, and the hiring and training of specialized personnel. These capital expenditures can be significant, especially for small- to mid-sized OEMs. By outsourcing, OEMs can convert these fixed costs into variable costs, paying only for the manufacturing services they need when they need them.

In the long term, outsourcing can lead to substantial savings, allowing OEMs to allocate resources more strategically to other business areas, such as innovation, marketing, and sales.

Reservation 4: "Outsourcing Will Lead to Intellectual Property (IP) Risks"

OEMs in competitive industries like medical device manufacturing need to protect their intellectual property. The fear is that outsourcing to a CM could expose sensitive information, leading to potential IP theft or misuse.

The Counterargument

Reputable CMs are acutely aware of the importance of protecting their clients' intellectual property. Many have robust IP protection policies in place, including non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), secure data management systems, and physical security measures. Furthermore, CMs often operate in highly regulated environments where protecting IP is a legal requirement. Protecting client IP is also a critical aspect of business success. Letting IP leak would damage a CM's reputation, potentially ruining its ability to attract future clients.

Of course, OEMs shouldn't trust that every CM will protect their intellectual property. It's important to thoroughly vet potential CMs, select partners with a proven track record of safeguarding intellectual property, and establish clear contractual agreements that outline the responsibilities and expectations related to IP protection. In many cases, CMs are more diligent about IP protection than in-house teams. After all, their reputations and future business depend on it.

Reservation 5: "We'll Lose Our Competitive Edge"

OEMs often worry that outsourcing will erode their competitive advantage by making them reliant on a third party for critical aspects of their businesses. They fear that this reliance could lead to slower response times, less innovation, or poor differentiation in the market.

The Counterargument

Outsourcing can actually enhance an OEM's competitive edge by allowing them to focus on their core strengths while leveraging the expertise of a specialized CM. CMs bring a wealth of knowledge and experience to the table, often staying at the forefront of technological advancements and industry trends. By partnering with a CM, OEMs can tap into this expertise, accelerate time-to-market, improve product quality, and foster innovation.

Moreover, outsourcing can help OEMs become more flexible and scale production up or down based on market demand without the burden of maintaining costly manufacturing infrastructure. This agility can be a significant competitive advantage in an industry where speed and adaptability are keys to success.

Rather than diminishing an OEM's competitive edge, outsourcing can enhance it by letting the OEM deliver higher-quality products more efficiently and effectively, all while staying ahead of the competition.

Embracing the Benefits of Outsourcing

While the reservations OEMs have about outsourcing their manufacturing to a CM are understandable, they are often based on misconceptions or outdated perceptions. In today's complex and fast-paced medical device industry, partnering with a reputable CM can offer significant advantages, from improved quality and cost savings to enhanced innovation and scalability.

By carefully selecting a CM with a strong track record, robust quality management systems, and a commitment to protecting intellectual property, OEMs can mitigate the risks associated with outsourcing while reaping the benefits. Ultimately, outsourcing can free OEMs to focus on what they do best—developing cutting-edge medical devices that improve patient outcomes—while trusting a capable partner to handle the intricacies of manufacturing.

In a world where time-to-market, quality, and cost-efficiency are critical to success, the decision to outsource is not just a strategic move—it's a competitive necessity.

Medical Device Manufacturing with Sanbor Medical

Sanbor Medical understands that you might have concerns about outsourcing medical manufacturing. If you still have reservations, please reach out to schedule a conversation. We're happy to answer all of your questions!

Subscribe to email updates

Smarter Manufacturing Starts Here.

Connect with our team to learn how a Sanbor partnership is the future of medical device contract manufacturing.

Connect With Us